by Abraham Lustgarten, Nicholas Kusnetz, and ProPublica
This article, published in December
2011, discusses the national argument over whether or not hydraulic fracturing,
or fracking, is a cause of water pollution in areas of Wyoming. Speculation began when residents of Wyoming
in the mid-1990s when residents made complaints of foul water. Later in 2004, residents began to notice that
the well water had turned brown shortly after gas wells were fracked
nearby. Due to these incidents, the
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, tested water samples from residents in
2008 and found traces of contaminants that were used in fracking. In 2010, the new test results confirmed the
previous samples, causing the EPA to caution residents not to drink local water
and ventilate their homes when bathing, for the methane found in their water
could cause explosions. EPA officials
said that contamination in Wyoming had seeped up from gas wells and contained
at least 10 compounds used in frack fluids.
These findings were the turning point in the national debate on whether
or not the contamination was actually happening. Environmental advocates argued for stronger
federal regulation of fracking, and members of Congress considered new
proposals to regulate fracking and strengthen construction standards to reduce
threats to drinking water. While members
of Congress disapprove of the harmful effects of fracking, one member of the
Senate, Senator James Inhofe, found the findings, “offensive,” and challenged
the investigation. The results from the
tests completed by the EPA contradicted arguments by the drilling industry,
such as one by the spokesperson of the gas company, Doug Hock, who denied that
the company’s actions were to blame, and that the contamination was naturally
caused. While there is strong evidence
suggesting that fracking is the cause of water contamination, agriculture,
drilling, and old pollution from waste pits left by the oil and gas industry
are also all possible causes. However,
the gas company, EnCana, declining to give federal officials a detailed
breakdown of every compound used underground is slightly suspicious. Unfortunately, without the consistency of
similar test results from different testing facilities, there cannot be any
facts proving that hydraulic fracturing is to blame for the water contamination
in Wyoming.
No comments:
Post a Comment